Web-Based Activity
Field Test Report
January 2000

 


The NASA Glenn Research Center Learning Technologies Project (Glenn LTP) is dedicated to supporting educational excellence in mathematics, science, and technology in grades K-12. A primary goal of the project is to research and assist in the development of supplementary educational materials. The Glenn LTP involves teachers in the development of the educational materials; teachers and students are involved in field tests. Evaluation forms provide feedback on the usefulness, quality, and appeal of the materials, along with recommendations for improvement.

During the summer of 1999, the Glenn LTP cosponsored one teacher professional development workshop to foster increased proficiency and use of computer technology within K-12 schools. Workshop participants created Web-based activities for K-12 classrooms using computer applications taught in the workshops. The 8 teachers created 27 Web-based activities for use with Glenn LTP educational products (EngineSim and the Beginner's Guide to Propulsion). The activities can be accessed from the Glenn LTP home page at http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12.

During the 1999-00 school year, teachers who used the activities in their classrooms were asked to provide feedback via an online evaluation form or a printed form. In addition, students provided feedback via a printed form. The following report summarizes the feedback from 2 teacher and 18student evaluations from the states of Ohio and Pennsylvania. It is separated into teacher feedback (overall average* of 4.0 on the activities evaluated) and student feedback (overall average* of 3.8 on the activities evaluated). The feedback is being incorporated into revisions of the activities.

A list of the teachers/schools participating in the field test is shown below.

Participating Teachers and Schools

Robert Merski

Holy Family Catholic School, Erie, Pennsylvania

Norma Holowach

Lakeview High School, Cortland, Ohio

After using the activities in your classes, please provide feedback by completing the evaluation form found at http://ehb2.gsfc.nasa.gov/edcats/centers/lltp_web.html. It is vital that teachers continue to offer suggestions for the improvement of the Web-based activities and other Glenn LTP educational materials.

This report was created and edited by Susan Martin-Vorndran, formerly RSIS, and Ruth Petersen, Integral Systems.


Teacher Evaluations (2 Responses)

Grade Levels:
8th Grade Physical Science and 9th Grade Science I
Number of Students Participating: 16
Total Number of Participants: 18


Average Rating*

Educational quality of activity:

4.0

Correlation with standards:

4.0


Type of instruction used:

Individual at Computer

X

Small Group at Computer

X

Whole Class/One Computer

__



How the activity was used by the class:

Choice

Number of Responses

Group Discussions

1

Integration into Existing Curricula

1

Lecture

1

Demonstration

1

Hands-On Activities

2

Team Activities

2


Features of the activity you found particularly helpful:

  • The experiment illustrated the law of motion
  • Nice integration of the use of computer with activity


How to make the activity more effective:

  • Work in groups of three next time


Additional comments:

  • "Nice Website! I'd Love to go again."
  • "The activity went well and led to a wonderful class discussion the next day."


Student Evaluations (16 Responses)

Grade Levels: 8th Grade Physical Science and 9th Grade Science I

Total Number of Responses
Average Rating*

Student enjoyment of activity:

13
3.8

Educational quality of activity:

16
3.8

How activity appealed to students:

13
3.6



How the class used the activity:

Choice

Number of Responses

Lecture

16

Demonstration

16

Hands-on Activities

16

Team Activities

16


Type of Instructional Format Used:

Individual at Computer

X

Small Group at Computer

X

Whole Class/One Computer

__


What students liked most about the activity:


What students liked least about the activity:

  • The experiment didn't last long enough
  • The experiment should have had more trials
  • All of the reading involved
  • The smell of the materials used in the experiment
  • Talking in groups instead of doing the experiment


Suggested changes to activities:

  • Include more trials in the experiment
  • Would try different amounts of vinegar and baking soda
  • Would experiment with different brands of film canisters
  • Would not change activity


Comments:

  • I think that we should do more activities like these. They bring great fun to learning.
  • It would have been more exciting with additional experiments.


* Average Rating is based on the following score:

5= Excellent

4= Good

3= Average

2=Poor

1=Very Poor


HOME
EDUCATOR RESOURCES
AERONAUTIC EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINTERNET ACCESS RESEARCH | ICING RESEARCH TUNNEL
PROFICIENCY SKILLS | EDUCATOR WORKSHOPS | TEACHER CREATED WEB PAGES | NASA - WVIZ EDUCATION CHANNEL
VIDEOCONFERENCES WITH THE U.K.


Please send any comments to:
Web Related: David.Mazza@grc.nasa.gov
Responsible NASA Official: Kathleen.A.Zona@grc.nasa.gov