Mathematical Thinking

Table of Contents
Introduction
Fermi's Piano Tuner Problem
How Old is Old?
If the Terrestrial Poles were to Melt...
Sunlight Exerts Pressure
Falling Eastward
What if an Asteroid Hit the Earth
Using a Jeep to Estimate the Energy in Gasoline
How do Police Radars really work?
How "Fast" is the Speed of Light?
How Long is a Light Year?
How Big is a Trillion?
"Seeing" the Earth, Moon, and Sun to Scale
Of Stars and Drops of Water
If I Were to Build a Model of the Cosmos...
A Number Trick
Designing a High Altitude Balloon
Pressure in the Vicinity of a Lunar Astronaut Space Suit due to Outgassing of Coolant Water
Calendar Calculations
Telling Time by the Stars - Sidereal Time
Fields, an Heuristic Approach
The Irrationality of
The Irrationality of
The Number (i)i
Estimating the Temperature of a Flat Plate in Low Earth Orbit
Proving that (p)1/n is Irrational when p is a Prime and n>1
The Transcendentality of
Ideal Gases under Constant Volume, Constant Pressure, Constant Temperature and Adiabatic Conditions
Maxwell's Equations: The Vector and Scalar Potentials
A Possible Scalar Term Describing Energy Density in the Gravitational Field
A Proposed Relativistic, Thermodynamic Four-Vector
Motivational Argument for the Expression-eix=cosx+isinx
Another Motivational Argument for the Expression-eix=cosx+isinx
Calculating the Energy from Sunlight over a 12 hour period
Calculating the Energy from Sunlight over actual full day
Perfect Numbers-A Case Study
Gravitation Inside a Uniform Hollow Sphere
Further note on Gravitation Inside a Uniform Hollow Sphere
Pythagorean Triples
Black Holes and Point Set Topology
Field Equations and Equations of Motion (General Relativity)
The observer in modern physics


Proving that (p)1/n is Irrational when p is Prime and n>1 

Problem:
Let p be any prime number, and let p satisfy the equation

xn - p = 0

or, equivalently, x = (p)1/n.

and specify that n > 1.11 Prove that x is an irrational number.

 

Solution:
The proof that, under this condition, x is irrational will be done indirectly by assuming that x is rational, then showing that this assumption leads to a contradiction.

Let x be rational; i.e., let x = a/b where a and b are integers. Then:

p = xn = an/bn = a rational number.

Since p is prime, then p is an integer. Thus, either:

bn = 1 or bn = am where m < n 12
  1. If bn = 1, then p = an, and p has factors other than p and 1,13 violating the assumption that p is prime. Therefore, bn not equal to1.
  2. If bn = am, where m < n, then p = am+1… an, and p still has factors other than p and 1,14 violating the assumption that p is prime.

Special case: If m = n - 1, then p = a, and bn = pn - 1, or p = b(n/[n - 1]) = b. But if this latter statement is true, then p = 1, and we violate the assumption that p is any prime.

Since the assumption that x is a rational number leads to contradictions in all possible cases, we must conclude that x is irrational.

 


11 Notice that, for n = 1, x = p, and p = p/1 = lamdap/lamda = mu/lamda, which is a rational number. The proof for irrationality is only valid when n > 1.

12 If n = m, then p = 1, and the assumption that p is any prime is violated.

13 Under this condition, p = a...a (taken n times), and a is a factor [divisor] n times over.

14 That is, a is a factor (n-m) times over.