Computer drawing of an airfoil.
FoilSim Field Test Report

November 1998


| Teacher Evaluations | Student Evaluations |
Participating Schools and Teachers


The NASA Glenn Research Center Learning Technologies Project conducted a field test of FoilSim, basic aerodynamics software, and the Teachers' Resource Manual for FoilSim Version 1.0 during the months of March, April, and May 1998. Ten of the twenty-four schools taking part in the field test returned teacher evaluations, a return rate of 42%. Nineteen student evaluations were also received. A list of the teachers and schools participating in the field test is given at the end of the report.

The feedback from the field test has been separated by teacher and student evaluations and is summarized below. Where possible, the feedback is now being incorporated into changes/revisions to the software and the manual. It is anticipated that the revised Manual for Version 1.0 will be available by January 1999. A new version of FoilSim and the accompanying manual should be available in the near future.

For additional information or to receive a copy of the revised Manual for Version 1.0, use the E-mail addresses shown below. After using FoilSim in your classes, please provide feedback by completing the Teacher Reply Card.




Teacher Evaluations (10 responses)

Schools represented:

Type
No. of Responses

Intercity

3

Private

2

Rural

1

Suburban

3

Urban

1

States represented: District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, and Ohio

Grade levels: K, 3, 5, and 8-12 (176 students total)

Quality of software:

Rating
No. of Responses

Excellent

2

Good

5

Quality of lessons:

Rating
No. of Responses

Excellent

3

Good

4

Quality of manual:

Rating
No. of Responses

Excellent

2

Good

5

Uses of software:

Use
No. of Responses

Background information

3

Demo NASA materials

2

Group discussions

1

Integration into existing curriculum

1

Lecture

1

Critical thinking tasks

2

Demonstration

3

Hands-on activities

5

Internet exposure project

1

With a flight simulator program

1

In a transportation class

1

Software features particularly helpful:

  • Ease of use
  • Immediate visual feedback
  • Excellent graphics display
  • Demo of wind tunnel technology, which is very difficult to create in school environment
  • Choice for control panel display (wing or baseball)
  • Use of probes
  • Good lessons at an easy reading level
  • User friendly
  • Lessons gave a good lead and then encouraged "testing" and "hypothesizing" on the students’ time—"what ifs" rather than failure!

Suggestions for making software more effective:

  • Include a 3-D view of wing that would allow students to see the surface area change
  • Allow students to design custom wings for gliders that they could then construct
  • Add the ability to print a scaled plan of the wing section
  • Adapt the program to include wing length
  • Lower speed and other parameters to focus on sizes and speeds of small, hand-launched gliders
  • Add the ability to see the effect of drag force on different shapes of cars
  • Add "Back" buttons at bottom of pages instead of on top menu bar
  • Add sounds (such as stall warnings)
  • Additional baseball-type screens
  • Break the background into quadrants with a different color for each quadrant
  • Translate the lessons into metrics
  • Additional probes
  • Place the probe controls over the wing area and color code them so they can be distinguished from the controls of the picture frame
  • Instead of having the speed gauge away from the wing, put a digital readout in the corner of the wing area
  • Make it possible to go through lessons without changing screens
  • Enhance material on the baseball portion
  • Directions in the Airfoil Lessons helped the students—add more to the baseball lessons

Manual features that were helpful:

  • Explanation of components (Help files and instructions on getting started on pgs. 5-16)
  • Copies of Lessons 1 & 2 with answers shown
  • Correlation between the views on screen and what was presented in the manual
  • Reference listing for additional information
  • Liked having a hardcopy of the lessons—knew what to expect
  • Step-by-step lesson procedures
  • Easy to get around

Ways to make manual more effective:

  • Color (to match the screen shots)
  • Move the Glossary utility to the beginning of the manual so the students can first get familiar with the terminology
  • Add a sample worksheet or chart, especially for "Factors that Affect Lift"
  • In instructions for getting started, add comment about multiple variables and suggest not changing all factors at once
  • Put all of the manual into the software rather than having a separate document

Comments:

  • Kids really enjoyed it.
  • I like it because it really demonstrates aerodynamic principles.
  • To be able to change the parameters of the experiment with a click of a button is fantastic, as is the ability to observe the results instantaneously.
  • Will be used in our physics course next year.
  • Additional resources would make it easier to incorporate into classes.
  • The product is super—will use it in honors geometry next year.
  • Consider an upper elementary (grades 4-8) version.
  • I can use this as a supplemental tool for my lessons in aerodynamics, aeronautics, and vehicle design.
  • Senior physics students enjoyed the software but felt it should show more views of the object and should include more lessons to give it greater variety.
  • Overall a very nice job!


Button to return to the top

Return to the top.




Student Evaluations (19 responses)

Schools represented:

Type
No. of Responses

Intercity

2

Private

2

Urban

2

States represented: District of Columbia, Illinois, and Ohio

Grade levels: 7-8 and 10-12

Enjoyed using FoilSim:

Answer
No. of Responses

Yes

12

No

6

Maybe

1

Quality of software:

Rating
No. of Responses

Excellent

1

Good

9

Average

6

Poor

3

Quality of lessons:

Rating
No. of Responses

Excellent

2

Good

10

Average

3

Poor

4

Quality of manual (if used):

Rating
No. of Responses

Excellent

1

Good

1

Average

4

Poor

2

Uses of software:

Use
No. of Responses

Background information

5

Demo NASA materials

3

Group discussions

1

Integration into existing curricula

1

Science and math standards integration

2

Critical thinking tasks

3

Demonstration

4

Hands-on activities

10

Internet exposure project

9

Team activities

2

Technical education

1

Software features liked best:

  • Baseball simulation—adds to the versatility of the software
  • Simulated the real thing—I was in control
  • The lessons--easy to flip back and to check definitions
  • Ease of use--simple point & click
  • The airfoil lessons
  • Ability to change from metrics to English
  • Help menu
  • Easily understood lessons

Suggested improvements to software:

  • Include decimals in the area input box
  • Add a complete aircraft model
  • Ability to hit the baseball
  • Lesson and simulation on same "page"
  • Go to CD
  • Additional colors
  • Language in definitions too difficult
  • Show a plane taking off (with wing adjustments) and landing during different types of weather conditions
  • Add a text box when you hover over an item to tell what it does
  • Ability to change temperature and barometric pressure
  • Add sound and more graphics

Helpful features of the manual:

  • Glossary
  • Pictures
  • Comprehensive explanations

Suggested improvements to manual:

  • More understandable--shorter & simpler
  • Explain the purpose of the simulation program
  • More graphics
  • Activities to print and work with pen and paper

Comments:

  • Very interesting--enjoyed using it
  • Needs to be better aligned with science, math, and technology
  • Use different colors for variables
  • Level of software too high for some children


Button to return to the top

Return to the top.




Participating Schools and Teachers

Mike Burich

Shaw High School, East Cleveland, Ohio

Dave Cornelius

Midpark High School, Middleburg Heights, Ohio

Mehran Dwinbaigyzand

Frank W. Ballou Mathematics Science Technology Academy, Washington, DC

Robert Morgan

University School, Shaker Heights, Ohio

Susan Nyrop-Dunn

Strongsville High School, Strongsville, Ohio

John Packis

Westlake High School, Westlake, Ohio

Jack Pyles

Home Schooler, Canal Fulton, Ohio

Mark Roberts

McLane Middle School, Brandon, Florida

Anne Sherry

Kenwood Academy, Chicago, Illinois

Doug Warren

Lorain Middle School, Lorain, Ohio


This report was created and written by Ruth Petersen, Educational Coordinator, Glenn Learning Technologies Project.

Button to return to the top

Return to the top.


Button to return to FoilSim page Back to FoilSim


Go to...

Beginner's Guide Home Page
Learning Technologies Home Page
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12
NASA Glenn Home Page
http://www.grc.nasa.gov
NASA Home Page
http://www.nasa.gov


Please send any comments to:
Curator:
Tom.Benson@grc.nasa.gov
Responsible Official: Kathy.Zona@grc.nasa.gov