NASA Space Mechanisms Handbook--Lessons Learned Documented

The need to improve space mechanism reliability is underscored by a long history of flight failures and anomalies caused by malfunctioning mechanisms on spacecraft and launch vehicles. Some examples of these failures are listed in the table. Mechanism anomalies continue to occur a nd to be a cause of catastrophic mission failures. Several factors cause problems for space system mechanisms. The space environment produces wide temperature ranges, thermal gradients, and rapid changes in temperature, which can bind the moving parts of mechanisms. Ultraviolet radiation and vacuum cause the properties of many materials to degrade to unacceptable levels or to behave differently in space than on Earth, making it difficult to simulate operation during ground tests. The lack of gravity in space causes mechanisms to operate differently than on the ground. Sometimes the effects of zero gravity can be simulated to some degree in ground testing, such as by offloading the weight of a deployable appendage. Other effects, such as lubricant migration, cannot be simulated and must be considered in the design. Finally, the launch environment imposes severe dynamic loads on mechanisms and can cause structural damage, loosen fasteners, and damage delicate surfaces.

SUMMARY OF SPACECRAFT MECHANISM FAILURES

Program

Date

Problem

Cause

Program 461

1964

Solar array failed to deploy fully

Mishandling during stowage

STP 67-2 (OV2-5)

1968

Solar array booms failed to deploy fully

Field modification problem

777

1970

Omni antenna latch broke during spin-up

Attitude control instability

Program A

1971

Antenna failed to deploy fully

Wire harness binding

Program B

1971

Solar array deployed late

Silicon rubber sticking

STP 71-5

1972

Boom failed to deploy

Dynamic clearance problem

Skylab

1973

Solar array failed to deploy

Interference with cabling or thermal blankets

Transit

1975

Solar array failed to deploy fully; cable hung up

Anomalous flat trajectory caused high heating rates

Viking

1975

Sampling arm failed to deploy

Debris in gear train

STP 74-1 (Solrad)

1976

Solar panel failed to deploy

Release mechanism binding

DMSP F-1

1976

Solar array failed to deploy fully

Excessive wire harness stiffness

DMSP F-2

1977

Solar array delayed release

Friction welding

DMSP F-2 

1977

Science boom failed to deploy fully

Microswitch failed

Voyager

1977

Science boom failed to deploy fully

Microswitch failed

Voyager

1977

Scan platform gearbox seized

Lubricant failed

Voyager

1977

Magnetometer boom misaligned

Unknown

Seasat

1978

Spacecraft power failed

Slip ring debris between power and ground rings

Apple

1981

Solar array failed to deploy

Failure of deployment device

DE

1981

Sensing antenna failed to deploy

Unknown

Insat 1

1982

Solar sail failed to deploy

Unknown

ERBS

1982

Solar array failed to deploy

Unknown

GLOMR

1985

Spacecraft failed to separate from orbiter

Canister door did not open fully

VUE

1988

Telescope failed to rotate about azimuth

Inadequate torque margin on azimuth caging arm

Galileo

1989

High-gain antenna failed to deploy

Cold welding in ball and socket joint

Galileo

1989

Instrument cover jettisoned late

Thermal binding

Magellan

1989

Solar array failed to latch at end of travel

Microswitch misadjusted

Macsat

1990

Gravity gradient boom failed to deploy

Inadequate force margin

CRRES

1990

Magnetometer boom failed to orient fully

Interference between thermal blanket Velcro and wiring harness

Ulysses

1990

Spin-stabilized spacecraft wobbled

Antenna boom thermal distortion caused spacecraft center-of-gravity offset

Hubble

1990

Solar array booms jittered as telescope went between sun and shade

Thermal gradient across boom diameter

ANIK E2

1991

C-band antenna failed to fully deploy

Thermal blanket interference

Unknown

 

Sampling arm failed to deploy

Screw backed out and wedged against housing

Tether Satellite System

1993

Reel-out mechanism jammed

Screw added for structural margin interfered with reel-out mechanism

GOES 10

1997

Solar Array Drive malfunctioned

Under investigation

Given these complexities, it is not surprising that it is not always possible to uncover and correct all the hidden problems with mechanisms prior to launch. Fortunately, there are ways to reduce the number of failures involving mechanisms and/or mitigate the effects of a failure of a component. In many cases, failures were caused by design problems that have caused similar failures in the past, and thus could have been avoided had the designers been aware of the past mistakes. Because much experience has been gained over the years, many specialized design practices have evolved and many unsatisfactory design approaches have been identified. In many cases, however, this knowledge has remained with the individual mechanism designer and has not been widely shared.

To alleviate this situation, NASA and the NASA Lewis Research Center conducted a Lessons Learned Study (refs. 1 and 2) and wrote a handbook to document what has been learned in the past. The primary goals of the handbook were to identify desirable and undesirable design practices for space mechanisms and to reduce the number of failures caused by the repetition of past design errors. Another goal was to identify a variety of design approaches for specific applications and to provide the associated considerations and caveats for each approach in an effort to help designers choose the approach most suitable for each application. The handbook also provides some design principles. These principles, which can be applied to any mechanism to avoid common failure modes, can be particularly useful for the esoteric mechanism configurations that dwell on topics that are not unique to space applications, it does does cite references, where appropriate, for additional information or more indepth discussion of specific topics.

The handbook is divided into six parts. Part I, Introduction to Space Mechanisms , starts with an overview of various types of spacecraft mechanisms. It then discusses the requirements that are typically imposed on space mechanisms, their implications, and what steps can be taken to ensure that the requirements are met. The discussion concludes with a description of a typical mechanism design process and addresses how the design evolves from concept to fabrication. Part II, Design Considerations for Space Mechanisms , provides guidelines for recommended design practices for most spacecraft mechanisms. It also contains subsequent chapters that are devoted to guidelines applicable to specific types of mechanisms. Part III, Space Mechanism Components , proceeds to the next level of detail and discusses design considerations for mechanisms. This part is divided into general design guidelines that are applicable to the various components of spacecraft mechanisms. Part IV delves into two areas of testing, environmental testing and tribological testing of space mechanisms. Part V lists expert areas and the names and addresses of individuals who are experts in those areas of testing. Finally, Part VI lists testing laboratories and the individuals involved in the testing programs.

We anticipate that this handbook will be useful to a variety of readers. By studying the numerous guidelines presented in this handbook, entry-level design engineers will be able to quickly gather practical information on how to avoid common pitfalls. Experienced mechanical design engineers who are new to space mechanism applications will benefit from learning the unique requirements created by the space and launch environments. Also, users who need to evaluate their suppliers’ products, but have little personal experience in the design of mechanisms, can find useful information on identifying key performance, risk, and cost drivers for most space mechanisms and components. The Space Mechanisms Handbook is available from Lewis’ Mechanical Components Branch.

References

  1. Shapiro, W., et al.: Space Mechanisms Lessons Learned Study, Volume I--Summary. NASA TM-107046, 1995.
  2. Shapiro, W., et al.: Space Mechanisms Lessons Learned Study, Volume II--Literature Review. NASA TM-107047, 1995.

Lewis contact: Robert L. Fusaro, (216) 433-6080, Robert.L.Fusaro@grc.nasa.gov
Author: Robert L. Fusaro
Headquarters program office: OA (Chief Engineer)
Programs/Projects: Safety and Mission Assurance


- Next article

Previous article

[Table of Contents] [Index of Authors and Contacts] [Glenn Research & Technology Reports for Other Years] About the name change from Lewis to Glenn] [Word Search of Glenn's WWW sites]

NASA Glenn Research Center NASA home page


Last updated June 15, 1999, by Nancy.L.Obryan@nasa.gov


Responsible NASA Official: Gynelle.C.Steele@nasa.gov
216-433-8258

Point of contact for NASA Glenn's Research & Technology reports: Cynthia.L.Dreibelbis@nasa.gov
216-433-2912
SGT, Inc.

Web page curator: Nancy.L.Obryan@nasa.gov
216-433-5793
Wyle Information Systems, LLC

NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices