Skip navigation links

Contents Authors & Contacts Print a copy of this R&T report More R&T Reports Search NASA Glenn Home NASA Home

Tradeoffs of Various Concepts for Planetary Vehicle Drives Studied

Exploration of the planets and moons of the solar system will require several types of vehicles, including manned and unmanned rovers, construction vehicles, and mining vehicles. These vehicles will need mechanical drives that are lightweight, efficient, reliable, and long-lived, even as they operate under harsh conditions involving temperature extremes, rough terrain, hard vacuum, and abrasive dust.

Space mechanisms design requirements are strongly application-specific. Factors that will influence rover vehicle drive design decisions include the speed, torque, weight and space allowances, temperatures, lubrication, challenges of the environment, and requirements for efficiency, life, and reliability. In addition, heat dissipation can be a problem for high-power drives, especially if solid lubricants are used.

This study at the NASA Glenn Research Center considered classical gear designs, including simple spur and helical stages and combinations of simple stages such as epicyclic (planetary) transmissions, including compound planetary and differential transmissions and harmonic drives. Each of these types has specific advantages and challenges.

The study also considered novel concepts, such as traction drive transmissions and hybrid traction-gear transmissions. Novel concepts need additional development work to establish their reliability and suitability for particular missions.

Very high gear ratios are available by cascading transmission stages. The stages need not be of the same type. For example, the 1500:1 ratio used on the Mars Exploration Rover was obtained with an 18.8:1 planetary first stage and an 80:1 harmonic-drive second stage. Staging can optimize the performance of a transmission. The Mars Exploration Rover benefits from the high torque to weight of the harmonic-drive output stage while avoiding problems from the limited life of the input bearing of the harmonic drive.

Some of the general characteristics are summarized in the table.

DESIGN TRADEOFFS FOR PLANETARY ROVER PARALLEL-AXIS TRANSMISSIONS
Advantages Challenges
Spur and helical gear pairs
Highest mechanical efficiency (>98 percent) Offers only a moderate speed ratio per stage
Relatively inexpensive Requires many stages for high ratios
Compatible with dry lubricants Helical gears have thrust load

Requires shaft offset (except reverted train)
Harmonic drives
Space qualified Limited life of wave generator bearing
High reduction in one stage Moderate efficiency (<80 percent)
Can be hermetically sealed Not very suitable for dry lubrication
Near-zero backlash
Simple planetary gear train
High efficiency (<90 percent) Complex (many components)
Compact, close-coupled design Requires multiple stages for high ratio
Much experience in aeronautics
Distributed loading of gears and bearings
Compatible with dry lubricants
Compound planetary gear train
High efficiency (<90 percent) Complex (many components)
Distributed loading of gears and bearings Moment loads on planet bearings
Compatible with dry lubricants
Differential planetary gear train
High ratio (500:1) possible in a single stage Complex (many components)
Distributed loading of gears and bearings Low efficiency, especially for high ratio
Compatible with dry lubricants
Traction drive
High efficiency (<94 percent) Complex (many components)
High ratio (250:1) High weight (30-percent higher than planetary)
Smooth operation (low noise/ripple) Possible surface durability problems
Compatible with dry lubricants Needs technology development

The graph relates the mass to the output torque of high-ratio, space-rated drives from four commercial vendors. The drives include 80:1 and 160:1 harmonic drives, two-stage planetary units with ratios from 61:1 to 114:1, and miscellaneous drives with ratios up to 17933:1.

Color graph
Mass of high-ratio transmissions from four commercial vendors as a function of the output torque. Curve-fitting mass M versus torque T yields M = 0.0678T0.7782, where M is in kilograms and T is in newton-meters.
Long description of figure.

Find out more about this research: Space Mechanisms Project: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/spacemech/
Glenn’s Mechanical Components Branch: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/5900/5950/

Glenn contact: Fred B. Oswald, 216-433-3957, Fred.B.Oswald@nasa.gov
Author: Fred B. Oswald
Headquarters program office: Exploration Systems
Programs/Projects: MTLAMPS


next page Next article

previous page Previous article


Last updated: October 16, 2006


Responsible NASA Official: Gynelle.C.Steele@nasa.gov
216-433-8258

Point of contact for NASA Glenn's Research & Technology reports: Cynthia.L.Dreibelbis@nasa.gov
216-433-2912
SGT, Inc.

Web page curator: Nancy.L.Obryan@nasa.gov
216-433-5793
Wyle Information Systems, LLC

NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices